The
International
Standards Organization (ISO) has voted against
Microsoft's
Office Open XML standard.
Votes were cast by ISO member bodies and 41 participating members from 104
countries. The procedure required a 66 per cent share of 'yes' votes from the
national bodies and no more than 25 per cent opposing ballots.
Microsoft failed to meet both criteria, with 53 per cent of votes in favour
and 26 per cent against. Members could also abstain.
The software developer had requested that the body fast-tracked the
application, which would have allowed it to become an official standard by next
year.
Microsoft now has the opportunity to address the objections at a meeting in
February and seek consensus on possible modifications. The national bodies will
then be able to withdraw their negative votes and pass the proposal.
If no compromise can be made, the fast-track procedure will be terminated.
Microsoft will still be able to submit the standard under the normal standards
development rules, but this will take more time than the fast-track procedure.
The defeat is a major set-back for Microsoft as it is attempting to keep
control over the market for productivity suites. Prior to ISO releasing the
results of the vote, Microsoft had issued a press release claiming
"
strong" global support.
The period leading up to the vote had been marked by strong lobbying from
Microsoft, as well as opponents led by
IBM.
Organisations are increasingly demanding that software supports open formats
that allow multiple applications to open, edit and save documents without
requiring licence fees.
A closed standard forces a lock-in with a single vendor and prevents
documents from being accessed in the future when a certain technology has been
discontinued.
Microsoft argues that its standard is more mature than the rival Open
Document Format (ODF). But many counter that ODF is well suited to the job and
that there is no need for two standards.
Some critics also have raised concerns about Microsoft's control over the
standard, even though the ISO ratification would ensure its independence.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article