Fear of being ridiculed as a "jobsworth" is stopping many people from
promoting energy-saving measures in the workplace, despite their support for
such practices when they are at home.
That is the conclusion of a new report from energy giant
E.ON which calculates that a widespread
failure to take even basic energy-saving measures such as turning off PCs and
lights when not in use results in £12.7bn and 7.1 billion tonnes of CO2 being
wasted by office workers each year.
The report, which includes an ICM poll of 1,000 employees at small and
medium-sized firms, found that 78 per cent fail to transfer energy-saving
behaviour they embrace at home into the workplace.
More than half said they were afraid to ask their boss for permission to
instigate such practices, while 55 per cent admitted that the absence of a
financial incentive meant they were more profligate with their energy use at
work than they are at home.
Furthermore, more than a quarter said they were unwilling to embrace green
office measures for fear of being ridiculed by colleagues.
Dr Peter Clough, behavioural psychologist at Hull University, said that peer
pressure was undermining many firms' attempts to promote greener practices in
the workplace. "Employees are still reluctant to stand out in the workplace as
environmentally conscious," he observed. "Within many companies a degree of
bravado and desire to flaunt rules can see those abiding by sensible green
policies labelled "jobsworths" or worse."
Firms committed to cutting energy use are advised to find ways to incentivise
staff to embrace green measures, according to E.ON. "You need to attack all
three areas stopping staff from turning off equipment," said a spokeswoman for
the company. "But the key issue is incentivising people to act as this shows
them the boss supports the measures and it helps change the culture because
everyone knows there are benefits to acting."
She added that a number of incentive schemes have been trialled by the
company and its customers, ranging from offering staff individual rewards for
cutting their personal carbon to providing a staff party if energy-saving
targets are hit.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article