Gaming firm
Electronic
Arts has been rapped by the
Advertising
Standards Authority (ASA) over a poster for
Burnout
Dominator that showed a wrecked sports car under the headline 'Inner peace
through outer violence'.
The ads, which were shown on the London Underground, attracted a barrage of
complaints objecting that the depiction of violence was offensive and likely to
encourage dangerous driving and anti-social behaviour.
Electronic Arts said in its defence that the intention of the campaign was to
reflect the consumer experience within the game environment, addressing in
particular the idea that playing the game might help relieve the stress and
tension of the real world.
The company believed that it was obvious that the ad was for a video game
and, as such, would not be seen to support real-life violence.
Electronic Arts added that the ad intentionally featured no people and thus
focused directly on the destruction seen in the game rather than on violence
against people in real life.
However, the ASA dismissed these claims, noting that the poster appeared in
an untargeted medium.
"We considered that the vivid depiction of the crashed car and the burning
tyre, combined with the slogan's implication that people could achieve inner
peace through acts of violence, was likely to cause serious or widespread
offence," the watchdog stated.
The ASA noted Electronic Arts' argument that the ad's message was that
playing Burnout Dominator might relieve stress and tension in real
life. But it still went on to ban the advertisement.
"We considered that the ad's placement on the London Underground meant that
it would be viewed by many, including young, people," the ruling stated.
"We considered that the images of a car that seems to have crashed at high
speed and a burning tyre, together with a reference to violence, could be seen
to condone a violent lifestyle, anti-social behaviour or dangerous driving. We
concluded that the ad was irresponsible."
Electronic Arts has been told that the ad must not reappear in its current
form.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article