Real wins patent victory

Friskit's $70m lawsuit fails

Written by Clement James

RealNetworks, the company behind the digital media player, Real Player, has won a patent infringement lawsuit brought by San Francisco-based technology licensing company, Friskit.

Frisket had been seeking damages of over $70m against Real, but Judge William W. Schwarzer of the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted RealNetworks' motion for summary judgment invalidating the claims of four patents asserted by Friskit.

Advertisement

In its motion, RealNetworks relied upon the recent legal decision in KSR vs Teleflex, in which the Supreme Court ruled on the proper standard for determining obviousness in patent cases.

The Supreme Court rejected any "rigid" application of existing tests for obviousness in favour of the "expansive and flexible approach" set forth in the Supreme Court's earlier decisions. RealNetworks relied upon that analysis to argue that Friskit's patent claims relating to systems for enabling continuous streaming playback from internet sites were "obvious combinations of elements found in the prior art", including RealNetworks' own internet products.

Judge Schwarzer agreed with RealNetworks that "all of the individual features of Friskit's patents which allow the user to easily search for and listen to streaming media existed in the prior art."

He also agreed with RealNetworks that "streaming media, including streaming audio, also existed prior to Friskit's patents," and that "a number of web sites allowed users to locate media to download or stream." After considering the prior art presented by RealNetworks, Judge Schwarzer concluded that "the idea of integrating these different components was not novel."

"We are very pleased with the results of today's ruling," said Robert Kimball, senior vice president and general counsel for RealNetworks.

"Since the legal dispute between the parties commenced over four years ago, Real has vigorously denied Friskit's patent claims and defended our position that we do not infringe its patents.

"While we respect intellectual property rights and the rights of inventors to protect their innovations, we have also made it clear that RealNetworks will not be pressured into taking a license for technology we do not use and patents that we do not infringe despite the cost of fighting in court."

Tags:

Further reading

Related whitepapers

Related jobs

Do you agree?

IT white papers

Search vnunet IThound

Top categories

Job of the week

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Hiring now on ComputingCareers:

Related IT jobs

Search thousands of IT jobs :

Search thousands of IT jobs:

Advanced search

Advertisement

Advertisement

Newsletter signup

Sign up for our range of FREE newsletters:

Existing User

Newsletter user login:

Enter email address to edit your newsletter preferences

Watch

Shaun Nichols

19 Dec 2008

2.93 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Podcast image

18 Dec 2008

17.6 MBComputing podcast - the highlights of 2008 More...

Shaun Nichols and Iain Thomson

15 Dec 2008

4.98 MBPodcast Special: Views from the Valley More...

Poll

Communications super-database

Communications super-database

Should the government be allowed to track our emails and internet use?

Previous poll results

Spotlight

CES logo

CES 2009 preview

vnunet.com looks at what is in store for delegates at...  More...

Lotus Notes

IBM unveils Lotus Notes 8.5

Collaboration suite beefs up Mac support and cuts email storage...  More...

Asus Eee Top

Review: Asus Eee Top ET1602 PC

A compact, touchscreen desktop PC best suited for basic computing...  More...

Moto W233 Renew

Motorola launches eco-friendly mobile phone

Moto W233 Renew handset is made out of recycled water...  More...

Primary Navigation