An online petition set up to try and persuade the government to halt the
controversial Phorm online advertising programme has attracted more than 18,000
signatures since its introduction in March.
The
anti-Phorm
petition is currently the fourth most popular entry on the UK government's
e-petitions web site. It advises that a number of ISPs are said to be
considering using the tool, or are already testing it, and asks the government
to strongly consider regulating its use. BT recently began a
third
trial of the technology.
Advertisement
"We petition the Prime Minister to investigate the Phorm technology and if
found to breach UK or European privacy laws then ban all ISPs from adopting its
use," the petition reads. "Additionally the privacy laws should be reviewed to
cover any future technologies such as Phorm."
Phorm has been
heavily
scrutinised by the government already and widely criticised on the web
because of the way it uses browsing information to serve accurately targeted
advertisements.
Although its creators claim that any data collected would be anonymous,
critics suggest that it might be intrusive and could violate personal privacy,
sentiments supported by the poll which currently has almost 18,400 signatures.
"The UK's three largest ISPs - Virgin Media, BT and TalkTalk - are all in
talks with a view to introducing the Phorm technology," the petition reads.
"This would result in the browsing habits of the majority of the UK
population being sold to a third party for advertising purposes.
"The opt out system for this technology is vague and unproven [and] even when
opting out your every move on the internet might be recorded.
"Surely this must be a breach of privacy laws, if not then the privacy laws
need to be changed to cover such invasive technology."
However, BT said the petition was “misleading” and “flawed”.
“The system doesn't breach privacy - it's an improvement for online privacy
over what is offered today,” said Jonathan Carter, senior media manager at BT.
“It's flawed as Kent Ertugrul has apparently signed up to the petition - twice!”
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article