The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) is investigating the
possibility that an electronic device caused pilots to lose control of a plane
leading to the injury of dozens of passengers.
Qantas flight QF72 from Singapore called in a mayday and had to make an
emergency landing after the pilots lost control at 37,000ft.
The plane made a series of violent manoeuvres that left 12 people seriously
injured and 30 in need of medical attention.
"A preliminary review of the data indicates that, after the aircraft climbed
about 200ft from its cruising level of 37,000ft, the aircraft then pitched
nose-down and descended about 650ft in about 20 seconds before returning to the
cruising level," said the ATSB.
"This was closely followed by a further nose-down pitch where the aircraft
descended about 400ft in about 16 seconds before returning once again to the
cruising level."
Investigators are examining all possibilities and have held talks with
Airbus, which manufactured the plane, to see whether the cause can be analysed.
An investigator told the Melbourne Herald Sun that the inquiry will
look at whether electronic items may have caused the problem.
"Certainly in our discussions with passengers that is exactly the sort of
question we will be asking: 'Were you using a computer?,'" said an ATSB
representative.
Computers and mobile phones have long been citied by some as dangerous to use
on planes, and they cannot legally be operated until the aircraft has reached
3,000ft.
"It is well known in the electrical engineering community that the operation
of electronics systems, including air navigation systems, may be adversely
affected by electromagnetic interference," said Chris Zombolas, technical
director at EMC Technologies, which tests electromagnetic interference.
"Could a laptop computer or mobile phone have caused Qantas QF72 to plunge?
The answer is 'yes'," he said.
However, press reports now suggest that the fault lay not with onboard
laptops, but with the aircraft's control software itself. Investigations are
continuing.
Do you agree?
Have your say on this article